Jake Tech Lab

Creality Halot-Mage S vs Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro

Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro comes out ahead of Creality Halot-Mage S on 3 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.

Creality Halot-Mage S
Creality Halot-Mage S
6.4
Fair
1 of 6 rounds
vs
Anycubic Photon Mono M7 ProWinner
Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro
6.8
Fair
3 of 6 rounds

The verdict

Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro takes it, 3–1 on rounds.

On the published figures, Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro takes 3 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.

Choose Creality Halot-Mage S if…

  • • You want Creality Halot-Mage S's edge on what it costs

Choose Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro if…

  • • You want Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro's edge on how fast it prints and how thin its layers go

Round by round

  1. Round 1What it costsCreality Halot-Mage S wins
    Creality Halot-Mage S8/10

    $489

    regular price (on sale $399)

    Source: store.creality.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro5/10

    $669

    regular price (on sale $489)

    • $669, against $489

    Source: store.anycubic.com ↗

    Creality Halot-Mage S wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  2. Round 2How fast it printsAnycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro wins
    Creality Halot-Mage S5/10

    150 mm/h

    max print speed (mm/h)

    • 150 mm/h, against 170 mm/h

    Source: store.creality.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro8/10

    170 mm/h

    max speed, high-speed resin at 0.1 mm (130 mm/h standard resin)

    Source: store.anycubic.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  3. Round 3How thin its layers goAnycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro wins
    Creality Halot-Mage S5/10

    0.05 mm

    min layer height

    • 0.05 mm, against 0.01 mm

    Source: store.creality.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro8/10

    0.01 mm

    min layer height

    Source: store.anycubic.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  4. Round 4How heavy it isAnycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro wins
    Creality Halot-Mage S5/10

    13.13 kg

    net weight

    • 13.13 kg, against 12.8 kg

    Source: store.creality.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro8/10

    12.8 kg

    machine weight

    Source: store.anycubic.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  5. Round 5How big a print it can makeTie
    Creality Halot-Mage S7/10

    223 x 126 x 230 mm

    build volume

    Source: store.creality.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro7/10

    223 x 126 x 230 mm

    build volume

    Source: store.anycubic.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

  6. Round 6How fine its detail isTie
    Creality Halot-Mage S7/10

    16.8 x 24.8 µm

    xY resolution

    Source: store.creality.com ↗

    Anycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro7/10

    16.8 x 24.8 µm

    xY resolution

    Source: store.anycubic.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

Creality Halot-Mage SCreality Halot-Mage S
Anycubic Photon Mono M7 ProAnycubic Photon Mono M7 Pro

Side by side

Overall score
6.4
6.8
Best
Price
See price
See price
How big a print it can make
7.7
6.6
How heavy it is
6.0
6.8
What it costs
7.0
5.6
How fast it prints
5.0
8.0
Head-to-head findings
How big a print it can make
223 x 126 x 230 mm
223 x 126 x 230 mm
How heavy it is
13.13 kg
12.8 kg
What it costs
$489
$669
How fast it prints
150 mm/h
170 mm/h
How many colors it can print
—
—
How hot its nozzle gets
—
—
How hot its bed gets
—
—
How hard it can accelerate
—
—
Record
Head-to-head record
0–1–2
3–1–1
Head-to-heads won
0 %
75 %
Rounds won
39 %
52 %
Pros
      Cons
      • $489, against $338
      • 0.05 mm, against 0.01 mm
      • 13.13 kg, against 8.8 kg
      • 150 mm/h, against 170 mm/h
      • 223 x 126 x 230 mm, against 298 x 164 x 300 mm
      • $669, against $559 (sale $499)
      • 223 x 126 x 230 mm, against 220 x 220 x 250 mm
      • 12.8 kg, against 12.4 kg
      Add a third option to this comparison →

      More 3D printers match-ups