Jake Tech Lab

Cursor vs Tabnine

Cursor comes out ahead of Tabnine on 4 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each company publishes and what independent review sites report. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.

CursorWinner
Cursor
6.2
Fair
3 of 5 rounds
vs
Tabnine
Tabnine
5.8
Weak
1 of 5 rounds

The verdict

Cursor takes it, 3–1 on rounds.

On the published figures and the independent review sites, Cursor takes 4 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.

Choose Cursor if…

  • • You want Cursor's edge on what it costs to start and trying it before you pay

Choose Tabnine if…

  • • You want Tabnine's edge on what customers say on trustpilot

Round by round

  1. Round 1What it costs to startCursor wins
    Cursor8/10

    $20

    the individual Pro plan, per month

    Source: cursor.com ↗

    Tabnine5/10

    Not stated

    Same as F0020: no Tabnine pricing is published on the brand's current official site after the Tricentis acquisition.

    • $39, against $20

    Source: devtoolsreview.com ↗

    Cursor wins this round on independent review-site data, not on its own claims.

  2. Round 2Trying it before you payCursor wins
    Cursor8/10

    Free plan

    the Hobby plan, with limited Agent requests

    Source: cursor.com ↗

    Tabnine5/10

    Not stated

    Cannot verify on official site: Tabnine was acquired by Tricentis (announced 2026-07-30, tricentis.com/news/tricentis-acquires-tabnine). www.tabnine.com now redirects to tricentis.com/products; tabnin

    • No free plan, against Free plan

    Source: devtoolsreview.com ↗

    Cursor wins this round on independent review-site data, not on its own claims.

  3. Round 3What customers say on TrustpilotTabnine wins
    Cursor5/10

    1.5 out of 5

    TrustScore from 337 reviews on Trustpilot

    • 1.5 out of 5, against 2.1 out of 5

    Source: trustpilot.com ↗

    Tabnine8/10

    2.1 out of 5

    TrustScore from 10 reviews on Trustpilot

    Source: trustpilot.com ↗

    Tabnine wins this round on independent review-site data, not on its own claims.

  4. Round 4What a team seat costsTie
    Cursor7/10

    $40

    Teams, per user per month

    Source: cursor.com ↗

    Tabnine7/10

    Not stated

    Cannot verify on official site: post-acquisition, Tabnine publishes no pricing. tabnine.com redirects to tricentis.com; tabnine.com/pricing returns HTTP 502; official docs subscription-plans page is e

    • Code Assistant, per user per month

    Source: devtoolsreview.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

  5. Round 5How many Trustpilot reviewsCursor wins
    Cursor8/10

    337 reviews

    reviews on Trustpilot, rated 1.5 out of 5

    Source: trustpilot.com ↗

    Tabnine5/10

    10 reviews

    reviews on Trustpilot, rated 2.1 out of 5

    • 10 reviews, against 337 reviews

    Source: trustpilot.com ↗

    Cursor wins this round on independent review-site data, not on its own claims.

Side by side

CursorBest for what it costs to startCursor
Overall score
6.2
Best
5.8
Price
See price
See price
What it costs to start
7.0
5.0
What customers say on Trustpilot
5.6
8.0
Trying it before you pay
7.2
5.0
What a team seat costs
5.5
6.0
What the top individual plan costs
5.0
—
Head-to-head findings
What it costs to start
$20
Not stated
What customers say on Trustpilot
1.5 out of 5
2.1 out of 5
Trying it before you pay
Free plan
Not stated
What a team seat costs
$40
Not stated
What the top individual plan costs
$200
—
How many Trustpilot reviews
337 reviews
10 reviews
What reviewers say
—
—
How easy it is to use
—
—
Record
Head-to-head record
1–4
0–2
Head-to-heads won
20 %
0 %
Rounds won
22 %
20 %
Pros
    • Code Assistant, per user per month
    Cons
    • $20, against $10
    • $200, against $100
    • $40, against $19
    • 1.5 out of 5, against 1.9 out of 5
    • $39, against $20
    • No free plan, against Free plan
    • 10 reviews, against 337 reviews
    • $39, against $10
    Add a third option to this comparison →

    More AI coding tools match-ups