Jake Tech Lab

NVIDIA B200 vs AMD MI355X

AMD MI355X comes out ahead of NVIDIA B200 on 4 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.

NVIDIA B200
NVIDIA B200
6.7
Fair
1 of 6 rounds
vs
AMD MI355XWinner
AMD MI355X
7.3
Good
4 of 6 rounds

The verdict

AMD MI355X takes it, 4–1 on rounds.

On the published figures, AMD MI355X takes 4 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.

Choose NVIDIA B200 if…

  • • You want NVIDIA B200's edge on how much power it draws

Choose AMD MI355X if…

  • • You want AMD MI355X's edge on how much memory it has and how fast its memory is

Round by round

  1. Round 1How much memory it hasAMD MI355X wins
    NVIDIA B2005/10

    180 GB HBM3E

    gpu memory

    • 180 GB HBM3E, against 288 GB HBM3E

    Source: dam-cdn.nvd.orangelogic.com ↗

    AMD MI355X8/10

    288 GB HBM3E

    dedicated memory size

    Source: amd.com ↗

    AMD MI355X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  2. Round 2How fast its memory isAMD MI355X wins
    NVIDIA B2005/10

    7.7 TB/s

    memory bandwidth

    • 7.7 TB/s, against 8 TB/s

    Source: dam-cdn.nvd.orangelogic.com ↗

    AMD MI355X8/10

    8 TB/s

    peak memory bandwidth

    Source: amd.com ↗

    AMD MI355X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  3. Round 3How much power it drawsNVIDIA B200 wins
    NVIDIA B2008/10

    1,000 W

    max tdp

    Source: dam-cdn.nvd.orangelogic.com ↗

    AMD MI355X5/10

    1400W

    typical board power

    • 1400W, against 1,000 W

    Source: amd.com ↗

    NVIDIA B200 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  4. Round 4How it handles scientific FP64 mathAMD MI355X wins
    NVIDIA B2005/10

    37 TFLOPS

    fp64/fp64 tensor core

    • 37 TFLOPS, against 78.6 TFLOPs

    Source: dam-cdn.nvd.orangelogic.com ↗

    AMD MI355X8/10

    78.6 TFLOPs

    peak fp64 matrix

    Source: amd.com ↗

    AMD MI355X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  5. Round 5How new it isAMD MI355X wins
    NVIDIA B2005/10

    2024

    year announced

    • 2024, against 6/12/2025

    Source: nvidianews.nvidia.com ↗

    AMD MI355X8/10

    6/12/2025

    launch date

    Source: amd.com ↗

    AMD MI355X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  6. Round 6Which memory generation it usesTie
    NVIDIA B2007/10

    HBM3E

    memory type

    Source: dam-cdn.nvd.orangelogic.com ↗

    AMD MI355X7/10

    HBM3E

    dedicated memory type

    Source: amd.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

NVIDIA B200NVIDIA B200
AMD MI355XAMD MI355X

Side by side

AMD MI355XBest for how fast its memory isAMD MI355X
Overall score
6.7
7.3
Best
Price
See price
See price
How fast its memory is
6.8
7.9
How much memory it has
6.5
8.0
How much power it draws
6.5
5.0
How fast it runs FP16 AI math
7.3
8.0
How new it is
6.5
7.8
Head-to-head findings
How fast its memory is
7.7 TB/s
8 TB/s
How much memory it has
180 GB HBM3E
288 GB HBM3E
How much power it draws
1,000 W
1400W
How fast it runs FP16 AI math
4.5 PFLOPS
2.5 PFLOPs
How new it is
2024
6/12/2025
Which memory generation it uses
HBM3E
HBM3E
How fast it runs FP8 AI math
9 PFLOPS
5 PFLOPs
How it handles scientific FP64 math
37 TFLOPS
78.6 TFLOPs
Record
Head-to-head record
3–2–1
7–0
Head-to-heads won
60 %
100 %
Rounds won
53 %
69 %
Pros
      Cons
      • 180 GB HBM3E, against 288 GB HBM3E
      • 7.7 TB/s, against 8 TB/s
      • 37 TFLOPS, against 78.6 TFLOPs
      • 2024, against 6/12/2025
      • 1400W, against 700 W
      • 1400W, against 750W
      • 78.6 TFLOPs, against 163.4 TFLOPs
      • 1400W, against 1000W
      Add a third option to this comparison →

      More AI accelerators match-ups