LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8

Round by round

1. Round 1What it costsSamsung Odyssey Neo G8 wins
   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE5/10

   $1,399.99

   lg.com price (no sale shown)

   • $1,399.99, against $1,299.99

   Source: lg.com ↗

   Samsung Odyssey Neo G88/10

   $1,299.99

   samsung.com list price (out of stock; $400 instant credit shown -> $899.99)

   Source: samsung.com ↗

   Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

2. Round 2How deep its blacks goLG UltraGear 32GS95UE wins
   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE8/10

   1.5M:1 (Typ.)

   contrast ratio

   Source: lg.com ↗

   Samsung Odyssey Neo G85/10

   1,000,000:1

   static contrast ratio

   • 1,000,000:1, against 1.5M:1 (Typ.)

   Source: samsung.com ↗

   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

3. Round 3How bright it getsSamsung Odyssey Neo G8 wins
   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE5/10

   1,300 nits (peak)

   hdr peak brightness @1.5% apl (typical 275 cd/m2)

   • 1,300 nits (peak), against 2,000 nits (peak)

   Source: lg.com ↗

   Samsung Odyssey Neo G88/10

   1,000 nits (peak)

   peak brightness (typical), Samsung spec table; the page banner says 2,000 nits

   • hdr peak, marketing text (spec table: peak 1000 cd/m2 typ)

   Source: samsung.com ↗

   Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

4. Round 4How fast it refreshesLG UltraGear 32GS95UE wins
   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE8/10

   240 Hz (4K)

   max refresh rate at 4K (Dual Mode: 480 Hz at 1080p)

   • max refresh rate, dual mode (240 hz at 4k)

   Source: lg.com ↗

   Samsung Odyssey Neo G85/10

   240 Hz

   max refresh rate

   • 240 Hz, against 480 Hz FHD / 240 Hz 4K

   Source: samsung.com ↗

   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

5. Round 5How fast its pixels respondLG UltraGear 32GS95UE wins
   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE8/10

   0.03 ms (GtG)

   response time, gtg

   Source: lg.com ↗

   Samsung Odyssey Neo G85/10

   1 ms (GtG)

   response time, gtg

   • 1 ms (GtG), against 0.03 ms (GtG)

   Source: samsung.com ↗

   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

6. Round 6How much color it showsLG UltraGear 32GS95UE wins
   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE8/10

   98.5% DCI-P3

   dci-p3 coverage (cie1976)

   Source: lg.com ↗

   Samsung Odyssey Neo G85/10

   95% DCI-P3

   dci coverage (typ)

   • 95% DCI-P3, against 98.5% DCI-P3

   Source: samsung.com ↗

   LG UltraGear 32GS95UE wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

Side by side

LG UltraGear 32GS95UE

Check price

Samsung Odyssey Neo G8

Check price

Overall score

6.8

Best

6.4

Price

See price

See price

How fast it refreshes

8.0

6.8

What it costs

5.0

6.3

How deep its blacks go

8.0

6.8

How sharp the picture is

7.0

—

How fast its pixels respond

7.5

5.0

Head-to-head findings

How fast it refreshes

240 Hz (4K)

240 Hz

What it costs

$1,399.99

$1,299.99

How deep its blacks go

1.5M:1 (Typ.)

1,000,000:1

How sharp the picture is

3840 x 2160

—

How fast its pixels respond

0.03 ms (GtG)

1 ms (GtG)

How bright it gets

1,300 nits (peak)

1,000 nits (peak)

How long the warranty lasts

2-year warranty

—

Which HDR badge it carries

—

—

Record

Head-to-head record

1–0–1

1–3

Head-to-heads won

100 %

25 %

Rounds won

50 %

33 %

Pros

• max refresh rate, dual mode (240 hz at 4k)

• hdr peak, marketing text (spec table: peak 1000 cd/m2 typ)

Cons

• $1,399.99, against $1,199
• 2-year warranty, against 3 years
• $1,399.99, against $1,299.99
• 1,300 nits (peak), against 2,000 nits (peak)

• $1,299.99, against $999
• DP 1.4, against DP 2.1
• 1,000,000:1, against 1.5M:1 (Typ.)
• 240 Hz, against 480 Hz FHD / 240 Hz 4K

More monitors match-ups