Jake Tech Lab

Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 vs ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM

ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM comes out ahead of Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 on 3 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G8
Samsung Odyssey OLED G8
6.6
Fair
0 of 6 rounds
vs
ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDMWinner
ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM
7.1
Good
3 of 6 rounds

The verdict

ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM takes it, 3–0 on rounds.

On the published figures, ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM takes 3 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.

Choose Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 if…

  • • You have a reason to pick Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 that is not on this list

Choose ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM if…

  • • You want ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM's edge on what it costs and how deep its blacks go

Round by round

  1. Round 1What it costsASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM wins
    Samsung Odyssey OLED G85/10

    $1,299.99

    samsung.com list price (no sale)

    • $1,299.99, against $1,099

    Source: samsung.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM8/10

    $1,099

    asus store regular price

    • asus store regular price (on sale $949)

    Source: rog.asus.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  2. Round 2How deep its blacks goASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM wins
    Samsung Odyssey OLED G85/10

    1,000,000:1

    static contrast ratio

    • 1,000,000:1, against 1,500,000:1

    Source: samsung.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM8/10

    1,500,000:1

    typical contrast ratio

    Source: rog.asus.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  3. Round 3Which DisplayPort it hasASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM wins
    Samsung Odyssey OLED G85/10

    DP 1.4

    displayport version

    • DP 1.4, against DP 2.1a UHBR20 (80Gbps)

    Source: samsung.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM8/10

    DP 2.1a UHBR20 (80Gbps)

    displayport version

    Source: rog.asus.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  4. Round 4How fast it refreshesTie
    Samsung Odyssey OLED G87/10

    240 Hz

    max refresh rate

    Source: samsung.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM7/10

    240 Hz

    max refresh rate

    Source: rog.asus.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

  5. Round 5How fast its pixels respondTie
    Samsung Odyssey OLED G87/10

    0.03 ms (GtG)

    response time, gtg

    Source: samsung.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM7/10

    0.03 ms (GtG)

    response time (gtg)

    Source: rog.asus.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

  6. Round 6How sharp the picture isTie
    Samsung Odyssey OLED G87/10

    3840 x 2160

    resolution, megapixels

    Source: samsung.com ↗

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM7/10

    3840 x 2160

    native resolution

    Source: rog.asus.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G8Samsung Odyssey OLED G8
ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDMASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM

Side by side

Overall score
6.6
7.1
Best
Price
See price
See price
How fast it refreshes
7.3
7.5
What it costs
6.7
8.0
How deep its blacks go
6.0
8.0
How sharp the picture is
6.0
6.0
How fast its pixels respond
7.5
7.0
Head-to-head findings
How fast it refreshes
240 Hz
240 Hz
What it costs
$1,299.99
$1,099
How deep its blacks go
1,000,000:1
1,500,000:1
How sharp the picture is
3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
How fast its pixels respond
0.03 ms (GtG)
0.03 ms (GtG)
How bright it gets
250 nits (typical)
1,000 nits
How long the warranty lasts
3-year warranty
3 years
Which HDR badge it carries
—
—
Record
Head-to-head record
2–1
2–0
Head-to-heads won
67 %
100 %
Rounds won
28 %
54 %
Pros
    • asus store regular price (on sale $949)
    Cons
    • 250 nits (typical), against 600 nits
    • 3840 x 2160, against 5120 x 2880
    • $1,299.99, against $1,099
    • 1,000,000:1, against 1,500,000:1
    • 1,000 nits, against 2000 nits (HDR)
    • 3840 x 2160, against 5120 x 2880
    • 90W USB-C, against 140W Thunderbolt 5
    Add a third option to this comparison →

    More monitors match-ups