Jake Tech Lab

UniFi U7 Pro Max vs TP-Link Omada EAP773

UniFi U7 Pro Max and TP-Link Omada EAP773 are level on what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.

UniFi U7 Pro Max
UniFi U7 Pro Max
6.7
Fair
2 of 6 rounds
vs
TP-Link Omada EAP773
TP-Link Omada EAP773
7.2
Good
2 of 6 rounds

The verdict

It's a dead heat.

Neither pulls ahead on the published figures, so the decision is in the details this comparison cannot see. Check the current figures on both pages.

Choose UniFi U7 Pro Max if…

  • • You want UniFi U7 Pro Max's edge on how much space one unit covers and how many devices it handles

Choose TP-Link Omada EAP773 if…

  • • You want TP-Link Omada EAP773's edge on what it costs and how fast its wired port is

Round by round

  1. Round 1What it costsTP-Link Omada EAP773 wins
    UniFi U7 Pro Max5/10

    $279.00

    1 unit, regular store price (store also shows a higher 'Surcharge incl.' price)

    • $279.00, against $189.99

    Source: store.ui.com ↗

    TP-Link Omada EAP7738/10

    $224.99

    single AP, regular price (sale $199.99, pre-order)

    • single ap, regular price (pre-order)

    Source: store.omadanetworks.com ↗

    TP-Link Omada EAP773 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  2. Round 2How much space one unit coversUniFi U7 Pro Max wins
    UniFi U7 Pro Max8/10

    1,750 sq ft

    coverage area per access point

    Source: techspecs.ui.com ↗

    TP-Link Omada EAP7735/10

    1,500 sq ft

    coverage per ap

    • 1,500 sq ft, against 1,750 sq ft

    Source: omadanetworks.com ↗

    UniFi U7 Pro Max wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  3. Round 3How fast its wired port isTP-Link Omada EAP773 wins
    UniFi U7 Pro Max5/10

    1 x 2.5 GbE

    uplink port speed

    • 1 x 2.5 GbE, against 1 x 10 GbE

    Source: techspecs.ui.com ↗

    TP-Link Omada EAP7738/10

    1 x 10 GbE

    fastest ethernet port

    Source: omadanetworks.com ↗

    TP-Link Omada EAP773 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  4. Round 4How many devices it handlesUniFi U7 Pro Max wins
    UniFi U7 Pro Max8/10

    500+ devices

    max. client count

    Source: techspecs.ui.com ↗

    TP-Link Omada EAP7735/10

    380+ clients

    concurrent clients

    • 380+ clients, against 500+ devices

    Source: omadanetworks.com ↗

    UniFi U7 Pro Max wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  5. Round 5Which Wi-Fi generation it isTie
    UniFi U7 Pro Max7/10

    Wi-Fi 7

    wi-fi generation

    Source: techspecs.ui.com ↗

    TP-Link Omada EAP7737/10

    Wi-Fi 7

    wi-fi generation

    Source: omadanetworks.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

  6. Round 6How many radio bands it hasTie
    UniFi U7 Pro Max7/10

    Tri-band

    radios listed: 6 ghz, 5 ghz, 2.4 ghz

    Source: techspecs.ui.com ↗

    TP-Link Omada EAP7737/10

    Tri-band

    radio bands

    Source: omadanetworks.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

UniFi U7 Pro MaxUniFi U7 Pro Max
TP-Link Omada EAP773TP-Link Omada EAP773

Side by side

Overall score
6.7
7.2
Best
Price
See price
See price
Which Wi-Fi generation it is
7.0
7.3
How much space one unit covers
7.0
6.0
How fast its wired port is
5.7
8.0
How many devices it handles
8.0
7.3
What it costs
6.0
7.7
Head-to-head findings
Which Wi-Fi generation it is
Wi-Fi 7
Wi-Fi 7
How much space one unit covers
1,750 sq ft
1,500 sq ft
How fast its wired port is
1 x 2.5 GbE
1 x 10 GbE
How many devices it handles
500+ devices
380+ clients
What it costs
$279.00
$224.99
How many radio bands it has
Tri-band
Tri-band
How many Ethernet ports it has
1 Ethernet port
1 Ethernet port
How fast it is rated
—
BE11000
Record
Head-to-head record
1–1–1
3–0–1
Head-to-heads won
50 %
100 %
Rounds won
33 %
56 %
Pros
    • single ap, regular price (pre-order)
    Cons
    • $279.00, against $189.00
    • $279.00, against $189.99
    • 1 x 2.5 GbE, against 1 x 10 GbE
    • 1,750 sq ft, against 2,500 sq ft
    • 1,500 sq ft, against 3,000 sq ft
    • 1 Ethernet port, against 4 Ethernet ports
    • 1,500 sq ft, against 1,750 sq ft
    • 380+ clients, against 500+ devices
    Add a third option to this comparison →

    More Wi-Fi systems match-ups