EcoFlow DELTA Pro 3 vs Bluetti Apex 300
Bluetti Apex 300 comes out ahead of EcoFlow DELTA Pro 3 on 4 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
Bluetti Apex 300 takes it, 4–2 on rounds.
On the published figures, Bluetti Apex 300 takes 4 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose EcoFlow DELTA Pro 3 if…
- • You want EcoFlow DELTA Pro 3's edge on how much energy it stores and how much it can power at once
Choose Bluetti Apex 300 if…
- • You want Bluetti Apex 300's edge on what it costs and how long the battery lasts
Round by round
- Round 1What it costsBluetti Apex 300 wins
Bluetti Apex 300 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How much energy it storesEcoFlow DELTA Pro 3 winsBluetti Apex 3005/10
2,764.8 Wh
battery capacity
- 2,764.8 Wh, against 4,096 Wh
Source: bluettipower.com ↗
EcoFlow DELTA Pro 3 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How much it can power at onceEcoFlow DELTA Pro 3 winsBluetti Apex 3005/10
3,840 W
continuous ac output (7,680w lifting power)
- 3,840 W, against 4,000 W
Source: bluettipower.com ↗
EcoFlow DELTA Pro 3 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How long the battery lastsBluetti Apex 300 winsEcoFlow DELTA Pro 35/10
4,000 cycles to 80%
cycle life
- 4,000 cycles to 80%, against 6,000+ cycles to 80%
Source: us.ecoflow.com ↗
Bluetti Apex 300 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 5How fast it switches in a power cutBluetti Apex 300 wins
Bluetti Apex 300 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 6How heavy it isBluetti Apex 300 wins
Bluetti Apex 300 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
Side by side
- $3,299, against $799
- 51.5 kg, against 12.5 kg
- $3,299, against $1,599
- 4,000 cycles to 80%, against 6,000+ cycles to 80%
- 2,764.8 Wh, against 3,840 Wh
- 3,840 W, against 6,000 W
- 2,764.8 Wh, against 4,096 Wh
- 3,840 W, against 4,000 W