AMD MI325X vs Intel Gaudi 3
AMD MI325X comes out ahead of Intel Gaudi 3 on 4 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
AMD MI325X takes it, 4–2 on rounds.
On the published figures, AMD MI325X takes 4 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose AMD MI325X if…
- • You want AMD MI325X's edge on how much memory it has and how fast its memory is
Choose Intel Gaudi 3 if…
- • You want Intel Gaudi 3's edge on how fast it runs fp16 ai math and how much power it draws
Round by round
- Round 1How much memory it hasAMD MI325X winsIntel Gaudi 35/10
128 GB HBM2E
hbm capacity
- 128 GB HBM2E, against 256 GB HBM3E
Source: cdrdv2-public.intel.com ↗
AMD MI325X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How fast its memory isAMD MI325X wins
AMD MI325X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How fast it runs FP8 AI mathAMD MI325X winsIntel Gaudi 35/10
1,678 TFLOPS
fp8 mme (matrix) tflops
- 1,678 TFLOPS, against 2.61 PFLOPs
Source: cdrdv2-public.intel.com ↗
AMD MI325X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How fast it runs FP16 AI mathIntel Gaudi 3 winsIntel Gaudi 38/10
459 TFLOPS
FP16 (signed) matrix (MME) peak, Gaudi 3 technical paper Table 5; 1,678 is the BF16/FP8 figure
- bf16 mme (matrix) tflops
Source: cdrdv2-public.intel.com ↗
Intel Gaudi 3 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 5How much power it drawsIntel Gaudi 3 wins
Intel Gaudi 3 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 6Which memory generation it usesAMD MI325X wins
AMD MI325X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
Side by side
- bf16 mme (matrix) tflops
- 1.3 PFLOPs, against 1,678 TFLOPS
- 1000W, against 900W
- 256 GB HBM3E, against 288 GB HBM3E
- 6 TB/s, against 8 TB/s
- 128 GB HBM2E, against 192 GB HBM
- 3.7 TB/s, against 7.37 TB/s
- 1,678 TFLOPS, against 4,614 TFLOPs
- 1,678 TFLOPS, against 2,307 TFLOPs