AMD MI300X vs Intel Gaudi 3
AMD MI300X comes out ahead of Intel Gaudi 3 on 5 of the 7 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
AMD MI300X takes it, 5–2 on rounds.
On the published figures, AMD MI300X takes 5 of 7 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose AMD MI300X if…
- • You want AMD MI300X's edge on how much memory it has and how fast its memory is
Choose Intel Gaudi 3 if…
- • You want Intel Gaudi 3's edge on how fast it runs fp16 ai math and how new it is
Round by round
- Round 1How much memory it hasAMD MI300X winsIntel Gaudi 35/10
128 GB HBM2E
hbm capacity
- 128 GB HBM2E, against 192 GB HBM3
Source: cdrdv2-public.intel.com ↗
AMD MI300X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How fast its memory isAMD MI300X wins
AMD MI300X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How fast it runs FP8 AI mathAMD MI300X winsIntel Gaudi 35/10
1,678 TFLOPS
fp8 mme (matrix) tflops
- 1,678 TFLOPS, against 2.61 PFLOPs
Source: cdrdv2-public.intel.com ↗
AMD MI300X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How fast it runs FP16 AI mathIntel Gaudi 3 winsIntel Gaudi 38/10
459 TFLOPS
FP16 (signed) matrix (MME) peak, Gaudi 3 technical paper Table 5; 1,678 is the BF16/FP8 figure
- bf16 mme (matrix) tflops
Source: cdrdv2-public.intel.com ↗
Intel Gaudi 3 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 5How much power it drawsAMD MI300X wins
AMD MI300X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 6Which memory generation it usesAMD MI300X wins
AMD MI300X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 7How new it isIntel Gaudi 3 wins
Intel Gaudi 3 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
Side by side
- bf16 mme (matrix) tflops
- 1.3 PFLOPs, against 1,678 TFLOPS
- 12/06/2023, against September 24, 2024
- 192 GB HBM3, against 288 GB HBM3E
- 5.3 TB/s, against 8 TB/s
- 128 GB HBM2E, against 192 GB HBM
- 3.7 TB/s, against 7.37 TB/s
- 1,678 TFLOPS, against 4,614 TFLOPs
- 1,678 TFLOPS, against 2,307 TFLOPs