NVIDIA H200 vs AMD MI300X
AMD MI300X comes out ahead of NVIDIA H200 on 3 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
AMD MI300X takes it, 3–2 on rounds.
On the published figures, AMD MI300X takes 3 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose NVIDIA H200 if…
- • You want NVIDIA H200's edge on how much power it draws and which memory generation it uses
Choose AMD MI300X if…
- • You want AMD MI300X's edge on how much memory it has and how fast its memory is
Round by round
- Round 1How much memory it hasAMD MI300X wins
AMD MI300X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How fast its memory isAMD MI300X wins
AMD MI300X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How much power it drawsNVIDIA H200 wins
NVIDIA H200 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How it handles scientific FP64 mathAMD MI300X wins
AMD MI300X wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 5Which memory generation it usesNVIDIA H200 wins
NVIDIA H200 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 6How new it isTie
Nothing to separate them here.
Side by side
- 141 GB HBM3e, against 186 GB HBM3E
- 4.8 TB/s, against 8 TB/s
- 3,958 TFLOPS, against 10 PFLOPS
- 1,979 TFLOPS, against 5 PFLOPS
- 1.3 PFLOPs, against 1,678 TFLOPS
- 12/06/2023, against September 24, 2024
- 192 GB HBM3, against 288 GB HBM3E
- 5.3 TB/s, against 8 TB/s