QNAP TS-264 vs UGREEN DXP2800
UGREEN DXP2800 comes out ahead of QNAP TS-264 on 3 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
UGREEN DXP2800 takes it, 3–1 on rounds.
On the published figures, UGREEN DXP2800 takes 3 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose QNAP TS-264 if…
- • You want QNAP TS-264's edge on how long the warranty lasts
Choose UGREEN DXP2800 if…
- • You want UGREEN DXP2800's edge on what it costs and how fast its processor runs
Round by round
- Round 1What it costsUGREEN DXP2800 wins
UGREEN DXP2800 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How fast its processor runsUGREEN DXP2800 winsQNAP TS-2645/10
up to 2.9 GHz
CPU burst frequency
- up to 2.9 GHz, against up to 3.4 GHz
Source: qnap.com ↗
UGREEN DXP2800 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How long the warranty lastsQNAP TS-264 wins
QNAP TS-264 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How much power it usesUGREEN DXP2800 wins
UGREEN DXP2800 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 5How many drives it holdsTie
Nothing to separate them here.
- Round 6How many CPU cores it hasTie
Nothing to separate them here.
Side by side
- 2 bays, against 4 bays
- $489, against $439.99
- up to 2.9 GHz, against up to 3.4 GHz
- 29.086 W, against 16.38 W
- 16.38 W, against 14.69 W
- $439.99, against $379.99
- 16 GB, against 32 GB
- 2 years, against 3 years