QNAP TS-264 vs QNAP TS-464
QNAP TS-264 comes out ahead of QNAP TS-464 on 2 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
QNAP TS-264 takes it, 2–1 on rounds.
On the published figures, QNAP TS-264 takes 2 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose QNAP TS-264 if…
- • You want QNAP TS-264's edge on what it costs and how much power it uses
Choose QNAP TS-464 if…
- • You want QNAP TS-464's edge on how many drives it holds
Round by round
- Round 1What it costsQNAP TS-264 wins
QNAP TS-264 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How many drives it holdsQNAP TS-464 wins
QNAP TS-464 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How much power it usesQNAP TS-264 wins
QNAP TS-264 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How many CPU cores it hasTie
Nothing to separate them here.
- Round 5How fast its processor runsTie
Nothing to separate them here.
- Round 6How much memory comes installedTie
Nothing to separate them here.
Side by side
Overall score
7.0
6.5
Price
See price
See price
How fast its processor runs
7.0
6.7
How far you can upgrade the memory
8.0
5.8
How much memory comes installed
7.7
7.2
How many CPU cores it has
7.0
6.0
How much power it uses
5.8
5.5
Head-to-head findings
How fast its processor runs
up to 2.9 GHz
up to 2.9 GHz
How far you can upgrade the memory
16 GB
16 GB
How much memory comes installed
8 GB DDR4
8 GB DDR4
How many CPU cores it has
Intel Celeron N5095, 4-core
Intel Celeron N5095, 4-core
How much power it uses
29.086 W
40.536 W
How many drives it holds
2 bays
4 bays
How fast its USB ports are
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)
How fast its network port is
2 x 2.5GbE
2 x 2.5GbE
Record
Head-to-head record
3–1
2–4
Head-to-heads won
75 %
33 %
Rounds won
52 %
37 %
Pros
Cons
- 2 bays, against 4 bays
- $489, against $439.99
- up to 2.9 GHz, against up to 3.4 GHz
- 29.086 W, against 16.38 W
- $639, against $489
- 40.536 W, against 29.086 W
- 2 x M.2 NVMe, against 4 x M.2 NVMe
- 40.536 W, against 38.3 W