Anker SOLIX F2000 vs Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus comes out ahead of Anker SOLIX F2000 on 4 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus takes it, 4–0 on rounds.
On the published figures, Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus takes 4 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose Anker SOLIX F2000 if…
- • You have a reason to pick Anker SOLIX F2000 that is not on this list
Choose Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus if…
- • You want Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus's edge on how much it can power at once and how much solar it takes
Round by round
- Round 1How much it can power at onceJackery Explorer 2000 Plus wins
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How much solar it takesJackery Explorer 2000 Plus winsJackery Explorer 2000 Plus8/10
1,400 W solar
max solar input (2 x dc8020 combined)
Source: jackery.com ↗
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How far you can expand itJackery Explorer 2000 Plus winsAnker SOLIX F20005/10
4,096 Wh
max expanded capacity
- 4,096 Wh, against up to 12 kWh
Source: ankersolix.com ↗
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus8/10up to 12 kWh
max capacity with battery pack 2000 plus, one unit (page also says 2-24 kwh with two units)
Source: jackery.com ↗
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How heavy it isJackery Explorer 2000 Plus winsAnker SOLIX F20005/10
30.5 kg
net weight (user manual)
- 30.5 kg, against 27.9 kg
Source: service.anker.com ↗
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 5How much energy it storesTie
Nothing to separate them here.
- Round 6How fast it switches in a power cutTie
Nothing to separate them here.
Side by side
- $1,999, against $899
- 2,048 Wh, against 2,073.6 Wh
- 2,400 W, against 2,600 W
- 30.5 kg, against 24.2 kg
- 2 h, against 1.7 h (0-100%)
- 27.9 kg, against 17.9 kg