Bluetti Elite 200 V2 vs Anker SOLIX F2000
Bluetti Elite 200 V2 comes out ahead of Anker SOLIX F2000 on 4 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
Bluetti Elite 200 V2 takes it, 4–0 on rounds.
On the published figures, Bluetti Elite 200 V2 takes 4 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose Bluetti Elite 200 V2 if…
- • You want Bluetti Elite 200 V2's edge on what it costs and how much energy it stores
Choose Anker SOLIX F2000 if…
- • You have a reason to pick Anker SOLIX F2000 that is not on this list
Round by round
- Round 1What it costsBluetti Elite 200 V2 winsBluetti Elite 200 V28/10
$899
price on bluettipower.com (tagged special sale, no strike-through shown)
Source: bluettipower.com ↗
Anker SOLIX F20005/10$1,999
listed price (store page gone)
- $1,999, against $899
Source: ankersolix.com ↗
Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How much energy it storesBluetti Elite 200 V2 wins
Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How much it can power at onceBluetti Elite 200 V2 winsBluetti Elite 200 V28/10
2,600 W
continuous ac output (3,900w power lifting, resistive only)
Source: bluettipower.com ↗
Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How heavy it isBluetti Elite 200 V2 winsAnker SOLIX F20005/10
30.5 kg
net weight (user manual)
- 30.5 kg, against 24.2 kg
Source: service.anker.com ↗
Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 5How much solar it takesTie
Nothing to separate them here.
- Round 6How long the warranty lastsTie
Nothing to separate them here.
Side by side
- $899, against $499
- 1.4 h full charge, against 1.3-1.8 h (0-100%)
- 24.2 kg, against 16 kg
- 24.2 kg, against 17.9 kg
- $1,999, against $899
- 2,048 Wh, against 2,073.6 Wh
- 2,400 W, against 2,600 W
- 30.5 kg, against 24.2 kg