Jake Tech Lab

Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 vs Bluetti Elite 200 V2

Bluetti Elite 200 V2 comes out ahead of Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 on 5 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.

Jackery Explorer 2000 v2
Jackery Explorer 2000 v2
6.0
Fair
1 of 6 rounds
vs
Bluetti Elite 200 V2Winner
Bluetti Elite 200 V2
7.3
Good
5 of 6 rounds

The verdict

Bluetti Elite 200 V2 takes it, 5–1 on rounds.

On the published figures, Bluetti Elite 200 V2 takes 5 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.

Choose Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 if…

  • • You want Jackery Explorer 2000 v2's edge on how heavy it is

Choose Bluetti Elite 200 V2 if…

  • • You want Bluetti Elite 200 V2's edge on what it costs and how much energy it stores

Round by round

  1. Round 1What it costsBluetti Elite 200 V2 wins
    Jackery Explorer 2000 v25/10

    $999

    regular price, base unit (sold out)

    • $999, against $899

    Source: jackery.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V28/10

    $899

    price on bluettipower.com (tagged special sale, no strike-through shown)

    Source: bluettipower.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  2. Round 2How much energy it storesBluetti Elite 200 V2 wins
    Jackery Explorer 2000 v25/10

    2,042 Wh

    battery capacity

    • 2,042 Wh, against 2,073.6 Wh

    Source: jackery.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V28/10

    2,073.6 Wh

    battery capacity

    Source: bluettipower.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  3. Round 3How much it can power at onceBluetti Elite 200 V2 wins
    Jackery Explorer 2000 v25/10

    2,200 W

    continuous ac output

    • 2,200 W, against 2,600 W

    Source: jackery.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V28/10

    2,600 W

    continuous ac output (3,900w power lifting, resistive only)

    Source: bluettipower.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  4. Round 4How fast it recharges from the wallBluetti Elite 200 V2 wins
    Jackery Explorer 2000 v25/10

    1.7 h (0-100%)

    emergency super charge, 0-100% (spec table ac adapter 1.75 h; menu says 1.3 hrs)

    • 1.7 h (0-100%), against 1.4 h full charge

    Source: jackery.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V28/10

    1.4 h full charge

    ac full charge time (0-80% in 1.1 h)

    Source: bluettipower.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  5. Round 5How much solar it takesBluetti Elite 200 V2 wins
    Jackery Explorer 2000 v25/10

    400 W solar

    max solar input (2 x dc8020 combined)

    • 400 W solar, against 1,000 W solar

    Source: jackery.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V28/10

    1,000 W solar

    max solar input

    Source: bluettipower.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  6. Round 6How heavy it isJackery Explorer 2000 v2 wins
    Jackery Explorer 2000 v28/10

    17.9 kg

    weight (approx.)

    Source: jackery.com ↗

    Bluetti Elite 200 V25/10

    24.2 kg

    weight

    • 24.2 kg, against 17.9 kg

    Source: bluettipower.com ↗

    Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

Jackery Explorer 2000 v2Jackery Explorer 2000 v2
Bluetti Elite 200 V2Bluetti Elite 200 V2

Side by side

Overall score
6.0
7.3
Best
Price
See price
See price
How much energy it stores
6.7
8.0
What it costs
6.0
7.3
How much it can power at once
5.8
8.0
How much solar it takes
5.0
7.8
How heavy it is
7.3
5.8
Head-to-head findings
How much energy it stores
2,042 Wh
2,073.6 Wh
What it costs
$999
$899
How much it can power at once
2,200 W
2,600 W
How much solar it takes
400 W solar
1,000 W solar
How heavy it is
17.9 kg
24.2 kg
How big a startup surge it handles
4,400 W surge
—
How fast it switches in a power cut
<20 ms UPS
—
How fast it recharges from the wall
1.7 h (0-100%)
1.4 h full charge
Record
Head-to-head record
0–3–1
4–0
Head-to-heads won
0 %
100 %
Rounds won
32 %
68 %
Pros
      Cons
      • 2,200 W, against 3,000 W
      • 4,400 W surge, against 6,000 W surge
      • 400 W solar, against 1,400 W solar
      • $999, against $589
      • $899, against $499
      • 1.4 h full charge, against 1.3-1.8 h (0-100%)
      • 24.2 kg, against 16 kg
      • 24.2 kg, against 17.9 kg
      Add a third option to this comparison →

      More portable power stations match-ups