monday.com vs Jira
Jira comes out ahead of monday.com on 5 of the 8 things that decide this, going by what each company publishes and what independent review sites report. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
Jira takes it, 5–3 on rounds.
On the published figures and the independent review sites, Jira takes 5 of 8 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose monday.com if…
- • You want monday.com's edge on what customers say on trustpilot and what paying annually saves
Choose Jira if…
- • You want Jira's edge on what it costs to start and what the top plan costs
Round by round
- Round 1What customers say on Trustpilotmonday.com winsJira5/10
1.2 out of 5
TrustScore from 188 reviews on Trustpilot
- 1.2 out of 5, against 2.1 out of 5
Source: trustpilot.com ↗
monday.com wins this round on independent review-site data, not on its own claims.
- Round 2What it costs to startJira winsmonday.com5/10
$9/seat/mo billed annually
Basic, billed annually (Yearly, default; team size 10 seats); rows under 'Complete features list'
- $9/seat/mo billed annually, against $7.91/user/mo billed monthly
Source: monday.com ↗
Jira8/10$7.91/user/mo billed monthly
Standard, billed monthly (Monthly, default; page team size shows 300 users)
Source: atlassian.com ↗
Jira wins this round on what the published sources say.
- Round 3What the top plan costsJira winsmonday.com5/10
Pro $19/seat/mo yearly (special offer)
Basic, billed annually (Yearly, default; team size 10 seats); rows under 'Complete features list'
- Pro $19/seat/mo yearly (special offer), against Premium $14.54/user/mo billed monthly
Source: monday.com ↗
Jira8/10Premium $14.54/user/mo billed monthly
Standard, billed monthly (Monthly, default; page team size shows 300 users)
Source: atlassian.com ↗
Jira wins this round on what the published sources say.
- Round 4What paying annually savesmonday.com winsmonday.com8/10
Save 18% yearly
Basic, billed annually (Yearly, default; team size 10 seats); rows under 'Complete features list'
Source: monday.com ↗
Jira5/10Save up to 17% yearly
Standard, billed monthly (Monthly, default; page team size shows 300 users)
- Save up to 17% yearly, against Save 18% yearly
Source: atlassian.com ↗
monday.com wins this round on what the published sources say.
- Round 5How big the free plan isJira winsmonday.com5/10
Up to 2 seats
Basic, billed annually (Yearly, default; team size 10 seats); rows under 'Complete features list'
- Up to 2 seats, against Free for 10 users
Source: monday.com ↗
Jira8/10Free for 10 users
Standard, billed monthly (Monthly, default; page team size shows 300 users)
Source: atlassian.com ↗
Jira wins this round on what the published sources say.
- Round 6Who picks up when you are stuckmonday.com winsmonday.com8/10
24/7 customer support
Basic, billed annually (Yearly, default; team size 10 seats); rows under 'Complete features list'
Source: monday.com ↗
Jira5/109/5 regional support only
Standard, billed monthly (Monthly, default; page team size shows 300 users)
- 9/5 regional support only, against 24/7 customer support
Source: atlassian.com ↗
monday.com wins this round on what the published sources say.
- Round 7How much storage you getJira winsmonday.com5/10
5 GB storage
Basic, billed annually (Yearly, default; team size 10 seats); rows under 'Complete features list'
- 5 GB storage, against 250 GB storage
Source: monday.com ↗
Jira8/10250 GB storage
Standard, billed monthly (Monthly, default; page team size shows 300 users)
Source: atlassian.com ↗
Jira wins this round on what the published sources say.
- Round 8Planning on a timelineJira winsmonday.com5/10
Gantt starts on Standard
Basic, billed annually (Yearly, default; team size 10 seats); rows under 'Complete features list'
- Gantt starts on Standard, against Timeline view included
Source: monday.com ↗
Jira8/10Timeline view included
Standard, billed monthly (Monthly, default; page team size shows 300 users)
Source: atlassian.com ↗
Jira wins this round on what the published sources say.

