Synology DS1825+ vs QNAP TS-664
QNAP TS-664 comes out ahead of Synology DS1825+ on 3 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.
The verdict
QNAP TS-664 takes it, 3–2 on rounds.
On the published figures, QNAP TS-664 takes 3 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.
Choose Synology DS1825+ if…
- • You want Synology DS1825+'s edge on how many drives it holds and how far you can upgrade the memory
Choose QNAP TS-664 if…
- • You want QNAP TS-664's edge on how fast its processor runs and how fast its usb ports are
Round by round
- Round 1How many drives it holdsSynology DS1825+ wins
Synology DS1825+ wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 2How fast its processor runsQNAP TS-664 wins
QNAP TS-664 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 3How far you can upgrade the memorySynology DS1825+ wins
Synology DS1825+ wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 4How fast its USB ports areQNAP TS-664 winsSynology DS1825+5/10
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps)
fastest USB port
- USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps), against USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)
Source: synology.com ↗
QNAP TS-664 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 5How much power it usesQNAP TS-664 wins
QNAP TS-664 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.
- Round 6How many CPU cores it hasTie
Nothing to separate them here.
Side by side
- AMD Ryzen V1500B, 4-core, against Intel Core i5-1235U, 10-core
- 32 GB, against 64 GB
- 2 x 2.5GbE, against 2 x 10GbE
- USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps), against 2 x Thunderbolt 4 (40Gb/s)
- Intel Celeron N5095, 4-core, against Intel Core i5-1235U, 10-core
- up to 2.9 GHz, against up to 4.40 GHz
- 16 GB, against 64 GB
- 2 x 2.5GbE, against 2 x 10GbE