Jake Tech Lab

Synology DS425+ vs QNAP TS-464

QNAP TS-464 comes out ahead of Synology DS425+ on 4 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.

Synology DS425+
Synology DS425+
6.2
Fair
1 of 6 rounds
vs
QNAP TS-464Winner
QNAP TS-464
6.5
Fair
4 of 6 rounds

The verdict

QNAP TS-464 takes it, 4–1 on rounds.

On the published figures, QNAP TS-464 takes 4 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.

Choose Synology DS425+ if…

  • • You want Synology DS425+'s edge on how much power it uses

Choose QNAP TS-464 if…

  • • You want QNAP TS-464's edge on how fast its processor runs and how much memory comes installed

Round by round

  1. Round 1How fast its processor runsQNAP TS-464 wins
    Synology DS425+5/10

    up to 2.7 GHz

    CPU turbo frequency

    • up to 2.7 GHz, against up to 2.9 GHz

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4648/10

    up to 2.9 GHz

    CPU burst frequency

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    QNAP TS-464 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  2. Round 2How much memory comes installedQNAP TS-464 wins
    Synology DS425+5/10

    2 GB DDR4 non-ECC

    preinstalled memory

    • 2 GB DDR4 non-ECC, against 8 GB DDR4

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4648/10

    8 GB DDR4

    preinstalled memory

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    QNAP TS-464 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  3. Round 3How far you can upgrade the memoryQNAP TS-464 wins
    Synology DS425+5/10

    6 GB

    maximum memory

    • 6 GB, against 16 GB

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4648/10

    16 GB

    maximum memory

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    QNAP TS-464 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  4. Round 4How fast its USB ports areQNAP TS-464 wins
    Synology DS425+5/10

    USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps)

    fastest USB port

    • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps), against USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4648/10

    USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)

    fastest USB port

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    QNAP TS-464 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  5. Round 5How much power it usesSynology DS425+ wins
    Synology DS425+8/10

    28.25 W

    power consumption (Access)

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4645/10

    40.536 W

    power, operating mode (typical)

    • 40.536 W, against 28.25 W

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    Synology DS425+ wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  6. Round 6How many drives it holdsTie
    Synology DS425+7/10

    4 bays

    drive bays

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4647/10

    4 bays

    drive bays

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

Synology DS425+Synology DS425+
QNAP TS-464QNAP TS-464

Side by side

Overall score
6.2
6.5
Best
Price
See price
See price
How fast its processor runs
6.0
6.7
How far you can upgrade the memory
5.5
5.8
How much memory comes installed
5.5
7.2
How many CPU cores it has
6.0
6.0
How much power it uses
8.0
5.5
Head-to-head findings
How fast its processor runs
up to 2.7 GHz
up to 2.9 GHz
How far you can upgrade the memory
6 GB
16 GB
How much memory comes installed
2 GB DDR4 non-ECC
8 GB DDR4
How many CPU cores it has
Intel Celeron J4125, 4-core
Intel Celeron N5095, 4-core
How much power it uses
28.25 W
40.536 W
How many drives it holds
4 bays
4 bays
How fast its USB ports are
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps)
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)
How fast its network port is
1 x 2.5GbE + 1 x 1GbE
2 x 2.5GbE
Record
Head-to-head record
1–3
2–4
Head-to-heads won
25 %
33 %
Rounds won
23 %
37 %
Pros
      Cons
      • 2 GB DDR4 non-ECC, against 4 GB DDR4 ECC
      • 6 GB, against 32 GB
      • 21.6 dB(A), against 20.5 dB(A)
      • Intel Celeron J4125, 4-core, against Intel Pentium Gold 8505, 5-core
      • $639, against $489
      • 40.536 W, against 29.086 W
      • 2 x M.2 NVMe, against 4 x M.2 NVMe
      • 40.536 W, against 38.3 W
      Add a third option to this comparison →

      More NAS drives match-ups