Jake Tech Lab

Synology DS925+ vs QNAP TS-464

QNAP TS-464 comes out ahead of Synology DS925+ on 3 of the 6 things that decide this, going by what each maker publishes. The one that matters for you may be one the leader loses.

Synology DS925+
Synology DS925+
6.1
Fair
2 of 6 rounds
vs
QNAP TS-464Winner
QNAP TS-464
6.5
Fair
3 of 6 rounds

The verdict

QNAP TS-464 takes it, 3–2 on rounds.

On the published figures, QNAP TS-464 takes 3 of 6 rounds. Treat that as a starting point and check the current figures on both pages, because prices and plans move.

Choose Synology DS925+ if…

  • • You want Synology DS925+'s edge on how far you can upgrade the memory and how much power it uses

Choose QNAP TS-464 if…

  • • You want QNAP TS-464's edge on how fast its processor runs and how much memory comes installed

Round by round

  1. Round 1How fast its processor runsQNAP TS-464 wins
    Synology DS925+5/10

    2.2 GHz

    CPU frequency

    • 2.2 GHz, against up to 2.9 GHz

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4648/10

    up to 2.9 GHz

    CPU burst frequency

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    QNAP TS-464 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  2. Round 2How much memory comes installedQNAP TS-464 wins
    Synology DS925+5/10

    4 GB DDR4 ECC

    preinstalled memory

    • 4 GB DDR4 ECC, against 8 GB DDR4

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4648/10

    8 GB DDR4

    preinstalled memory

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    QNAP TS-464 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  3. Round 3How far you can upgrade the memorySynology DS925+ wins
    Synology DS925+8/10

    32 GB

    maximum memory

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4645/10

    16 GB

    maximum memory

    • 16 GB, against 32 GB

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    Synology DS925+ wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  4. Round 4How fast its USB ports areQNAP TS-464 wins
    Synology DS925+5/10

    USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps)

    fastest USB port

    • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps), against USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4648/10

    USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)

    fastest USB port

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    QNAP TS-464 wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  5. Round 5How much power it usesSynology DS925+ wins
    Synology DS925+8/10

    37.91 W

    power consumption (Access)

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4645/10

    40.536 W

    power, operating mode (typical)

    • 40.536 W, against 37.91 W

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    Synology DS925+ wins this round on what the company itself publishes.

  6. Round 6How many drives it holdsTie
    Synology DS925+7/10

    4 bays

    drive bays

    Source: synology.com ↗

    QNAP TS-4647/10

    4 bays

    drive bays

    Source: qnap.com ↗

    Nothing to separate them here.

Synology DS925+Synology DS925+
QNAP TS-464QNAP TS-464

Side by side

Overall score
6.1
6.5
Best
Price
See price
See price
How fast its processor runs
5.0
6.7
How far you can upgrade the memory
6.6
5.8
How much memory comes installed
5.8
7.2
How many CPU cores it has
6.5
6.0
How much power it uses
6.3
5.5
Head-to-head findings
How fast its processor runs
2.2 GHz
up to 2.9 GHz
How far you can upgrade the memory
32 GB
16 GB
How much memory comes installed
4 GB DDR4 ECC
8 GB DDR4
How many CPU cores it has
AMD Ryzen V1500B, 4-core
Intel Celeron N5095, 4-core
How much power it uses
37.91 W
40.536 W
How many drives it holds
4 bays
4 bays
How fast its USB ports are
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps)
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)
How fast its network port is
2 x 2.5GbE
2 x 2.5GbE
Record
Head-to-head record
3–6
2–4
Head-to-heads won
33 %
33 %
Rounds won
24 %
37 %
Pros
      Cons
      • 4 bays, against 5 bays
      • 4 GB DDR4 ECC, against 8 GB DDR4 ECC
      • 9 drives with expansion, against 15 drives with expansion
      • 2.2 GHz, against up to 2.7 GHz
      • $639, against $489
      • 40.536 W, against 29.086 W
      • 2 x M.2 NVMe, against 4 x M.2 NVMe
      • 40.536 W, against 38.3 W
      Add a third option to this comparison →

      More NAS drives match-ups